microsoft/Phi-3-medium-4k-instruct
14B params · est. 8.4 GB Q4
Head-to-head
Compare recorded specifications and inspect source links for both devices. Speed comparisons appear only when workload, runtime version, quantization, context and batch match.
Device profile
Compared here against Apple M3 Ultra (80c GPU, 512GB).
Matched rows below
128 GB
240 W
Not scored
Device profile
Compared here against NVIDIA DGX Spark (Project DIGITS, 128GB).
Matched rows below
512 GB
100 W
Not scored
Speed comparisons require matching runtime settings. A missing score means insufficient comparative evidence.
Apple M3 Ultra (80c GPU, 512GB) wins VRAM capacity.
Apple M3 Ultra (80c GPU, 512GB) has the lower published power rating.
| Metric | NVIDIA DGX Spark (Project DIGITS, 128GB) | Apple M3 Ultra (80c GPU, 512GB) |
|---|---|---|
| MyAI rating | Not scored | Not scored |
| Speed comparison | See matched rows below | See matched rows below |
| VRAM | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| TDP | 240 W | 100 W |
| MSRP | $3.0k | $10.0k |
| Workloads | 8 | 10 |
This shortlist cross-references the external OpenEvals snapshot with an approximate Q4-class VRAM estimate. Use it to sanity-check whether the hardware you are comparing can host strong open models, not just benchmark toy workloads.
microsoft/Phi-3-medium-4k-instruct
14B params · est. 8.4 GB Q4
Qwen/Qwen2-72B
73B params · est. 43.6 GB Q4
microsoft/Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
3.8B params · est. 2.3 GB Q4
internlm/internlm2_5-7b-chat
7.7B params · est. 4.6 GB Q4